![]() ![]() JUDGE: i assure you i am very calm… are you?ĮUGENE: Don’t even bother me with the fact that you are very calm…Īnother transcript sees a different judge take a firmer line of questioning:ĮUGENE: I’m a young boy, if you care to know. ![]() JUDGE: grammar… aren’t too tedious! A bit rude of you… The conversation proceeds as follows:ĮUGENE: Well, I’ll read something of your books, if they ain’t too tedious (which is highly possible:-) In one spiky exchange, the judge – who does not know whether they are talking with a computer or a human – tells Eugene they are an actress and writer. Such personality traits – combined with the occasional spelling error – “add human credibility”. The researchers conclude that one ‘ploy’ by the chatbot was to attempt to take control of the conversation and steer it by answering a question with a question or even changing the subject as real people often do. ![]() Professor Kevin Warwick and Dr Huma Shah, the paper’s authors, examined 10 of the transcripts in which judges were duped by Eugene, and considered how the deception was achieved. Transcripts which show how a chatbot became the first computer to pass the renowned Turing test are revealed for the first time in a newly published paper in the Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence.Ī year after Eugene Goostman – an ‘artificial conversational entity’ posing as a 13 year-old Ukrainian boy – fooled enough judges into incorrectly identifying it during the test, researchers from Coventry University claim that idiosyncrasy, inquisitiveness and the odd grammatical error were behind the bot’s success. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |